Upper secondary school leaving celebrations and final exams – consultations in general practice and emergency care

Inger Johanne Bakken; Knut-Arne Wensaas; Gry Marysol Grøneng; Atle Fretheim; Camilla Stoltenberg; Knut Inge Klepp; Siri Eldevik Håberg; Simon Øverland

doi:10.4045/tidsskr.17.0158

Upper secondary school leaving celebrations and final exams – consultations in general practice and emergency care

Inger Johanne Bakken, Knut-Arne Wensaas, Gry Marysol Grøneng, Atle Fretheim, Camilla Stoltenberg, Knut Inge Klepp, Siri Eldevik Håberg, Simon Øverland

See All Articles

Inger Johanne Bakken

Inger Johanne Bakken (born 1968) Dr.ing. in biophysics and medical technology, and senior advisor. She has contributed to the conception, design, data analysis, interpretation of results and preparation/revision of the manuscript, and has approved the submitted version.

The author has completed the ICMJE form and declares no conflicts of interest.

E-mail: inger.johanne.bakken@fhi.no

Norwegian Institute of Public Health

See All Articles

Knut-Arne Wensaas

Knut-Arne Wensaas (born 1964) Postdoctoral fellow, associate professor II, specialist in general practice and GP. He has contributed to the design, interpretation of results and preparation/revision of the manuscript, and has approved the submitted version.

The author has completed the ICMJE form and declares no conflicts of interest.

General Practice Research Unit

Uni Research Health

and

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care

University of Bergen

See All Articles

Gry Marysol Grøneng

Gry Marysol Grøneng (born 1978) Veterinary with a PhD in epidemiology. She is a senior advisor and project manager for the Norwegian Syndromic Surveillance System. She has contributed to the design, interpretation of results and preparation/revision of the manuscript, and has approved the submitted version.

The author has completed the ICMJE form and declares no conflicts of interest.

Norwegian Institute of Public Health

See All Articles

Atle Fretheim

Atle Fretheim (born 1968) MD, head of unit and Professor II at the University of Oslo. He has contributed to the interpretation of results and preparation/revision of the manuscript, and has approved the submitted version.

The author has completed the ICMJE form and declares no conflicts of interest.

Norwegian Institute of Public Health

See All Articles

Camilla Stoltenberg

Camilla Stoltenberg (born 1958) MD, PhD in epidemiology, Professor II at the University of Bergen and Director General of the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. She has contributed to the interpretation of results and preparation/revision of the manuscript, and has approved the submitted version.

The author has completed the ICMJE form and declares no conflicts of interest.

Norwegian Institute of Public Health

and

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care

University of Bergen

See All Articles

Knut Inge Klepp

Knut Inge Klepp (born 1955) Master’s degree in public health and PhD in epidemiology. Professor II at the University of Oslo. He has contributed to the interpretation of results and preparation/revision of the manuscript, and has approved the submitted version.

The author has completed the ICMJE form and declares no conflicts of interest.

Norwegian Institute of Public Health

See All Articles

Siri Eldevik Håberg

Siri Eldevik Håberg (born 1969) MD, PhD in epidemiology and specialist director. She has contributed to the conception, design, data analysis, interpretation of results and preparation/revision of the manuscript, and has approved the submitted version.

The author has completed the ICMJE form and declares no conflicts of interest.

Norwegian Institute of Public Health

See All Articles

Simon Øverland

Simon Øverland (born 1975) Psychologist, PhD, specialist director, and professor II at the University of Bergen. He has contributed to the conception, design, literature review, interpretation of results and preparation/revision of the manuscript and has approved the submitted version.

The author has completed the ICMJE form and declares no conflicts of interest.

Norwegian Institute of Public Health

and

Department of Psychosocial Science

University of Bergen

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increased use of antibiotics and a higher rate of injury in May for 19-year-olds have been described earlier. We examined whether 19-year-olds also demonstrate greater use of general practitioner services at the time of russefeiring – celebrations in connection with completion of upper secondary school.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The study is based on data from the Directorate of Health’s system for the control and payment of reimbursements to healthcare providers (KUHR) for all consultations in the general practitioner services for age group 18 – 20 years in the period 2012 – 15. The number of consultations per month and age group were analysed using Poisson regression, with 19-year-olds in March as a reference group. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) was the outcome measure.

RESULTS

All calendar years showed a sharp increase in the number of consultations among 19-year-olds in May in all calendar years compared with other calendar months and the cohorts above and below. The incidence rate ratio for consultations with GPs and emergency departments was 1.40 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.38 – 1.41) and 2.07 (95 % CI 2.02 – 2.13). The increase was greatest for respiratory infections (IRR 3.64, 95 % CI 3.55 – 3.73). The incidence rate ratio for injuries was 1.21 (95 % CI 1.16 – 1.27). The increase commenced in the three weeks before 17 May (Constitution Day) and persisted in the following two weeks.

INTERPRETATION

The sharp increase in the number of consultations for 19-year-olds in the general practitioner services is associated timewise with celebrations in connection with completion of upper secondary school (russefeiring). More frequent contact with these services lasts well into the ensuing examination period.

Article

In Norway, everyone who has completed basic schooling has a statutory right to a full-time, three-year course of upper secondary education. Most young people take advantage of this offer, and in 2015, over 90 % in the age group 16 – 18 participated in upper secondary education (1).

Celebrating the completion of upper secondary school – russefeiring – has long traditions in Norway. The normal practice is that you become a russ in the year you turn 19. Even though no more than 73 % of those who have commenced a course of upper-secondary education have completed this after five years (1), most young people participate in these celebrations the year they turn 19. For many, it means several weeks of celebrations largely outdoors, marked by a high intake of alcohol (2), both potential risk factors for illness and injury. Russefeiring is at its peak in the weeks prior to Norway’s Constitution Day on 17 May. Examinations for school leavers are held in the ensuing weeks, usually beginning on 19 May (3). Pupils receive examination grades as well as grades for overall achievement, and these count when pupils apply for admission to higher education.

Earlier studies have shown an increased incidence of injuries treated by the specialist health services (4) and increased use of antibiotics and cough medicine (5) among 19-year-olds in May. Outbreaks of meningococcal infections among russ have also been reported (6). Apart from this, we have little knowledge about the state of health of these pupils and their use of the health services.

In this study we examined 19-year-olds’ use of the general practitioner services in connection with russefeiring. We compared consultations in May with consultations in the other months of the year, and compared 19-year-olds with young people who were one year older or one year younger. We analysed consultations with regular GPs and emergency departments, and studied a sample of diagnostic groups more closely.

Material and Method

The study is based on data from the Directorate of Health’s system for the control and payment of reimbursements to health service providers (KUHR), which contains information about all patient contact with regular GPs and emergency departments. The population base per 1 January for 2012 – 15 is derived from Statistics Norway's website (7). Identifiable characteristics that could be traced to an individual were removed and the study therefore was exempt from notification to a regional medical research ethics committee.

The source data consisted of reimbursement claims from the general practitioner services for a four-year period (2012 – 15) for cohorts turning 18, 19 or 20 years during each of the relevant calendar years. The data set contained information about year of birth and sex, date of consultation, diagnostic codes in accordance with the International Classification of Primary Care 2 (ICPC-2), fee codes and type of practice (regular GP/emergency department). We included consultations with fee codes 2ad (daytime consultation with a GP), 2ak (consultation with a GP during the evening, night or at the weekend) and 2fk (consultation and emergency response to medical practice during out-of-hours services) (8). Telephone contact and house calls were not included.

We calculated age by subtracting the year of birth from the calendar year. We use the term «19-year-olds» for anyone who turned 19 during a specified calendar year, regardless of when they were born during the year. We categorised 18 and 19-year-olds in the same way. In the Norwegian school system, children start at school in the year they turn six, and with normal progression, by our definition the «russ» cohort will be composed of 19-year-olds.

For most consultations, only one diagnostic code was registered (87.2 %). We took all registered codes into account when grouping diagnoses into six different main categories: respiratory tract infections, general pain and musculoskeletal complaints, mental health problems, accidents and injuries, gastrointestinal complaints, and other conditions (e-tab 1). In addition, we checked each individual ICPC-2 code separately within the largest group (respiratory infections). The grouping was based on Statistics Norway’s classification (9).

Table 1

Allocation of ICPC-2 codes (International Classification of Primary Care 2) to six diagnostic groups used in analysis of consultations with a GP or the emergency department for young people aged 18 to 20

Group ¹	ICPC-2 codes
Respiratory tract infections, including ear infections	R05, R09-R23, R71-R83, H71-H74
General pain and musculoskeletal complaints, including joint and rheumatic problems	L01, L08-L17, L83, L87,L92,L93, L02-L03, L84-L86, A01, L18-L19, L29, L07, L20, L88-L91, L94
Mental illness or mental health problems	P01-P99
Accidents and injuries	A80-A82, A84, A86, A88, B76-B77, D79-D80, F75-F79, H76-H79, L72-L81, L96, N79-N81, R87-R88, S12-S19, S80, U80, X82, Y80
Gastrointestinal complaints	D01-D12, D17-D21, D84-D87, D90, D92, D93
Other conditions	All other codes

¹ Groups based on Statistics Norway’s groups (9)

Statistical analyses

All analyses were performed using the Stata®14 statistical package (Statacorp, Texas). We presented the number of consultations per calendar month by cohort and year graphically. In addition, we used the Poisson regression model with the number of consultations per month as an outcome variable, and various combinations of year, month, sex, and cohort as explanatory variables. In the Poisson regression, we took into account the population in the different categories and the number of days in the month in question.

The results are presented as incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) with data from 19-year-olds in March as reference. The IRR therefore gives a measurement of the number of consultations for a given cohort in a given calendar month seen in relation to the number of consultations for 19-year-olds in March.

We chose 19-year-olds as the reference category to prevent any differences in the number of consultations based on age rather than calendar month from influencing the results. March was chosen because it is the month that is closest in time without being part of the most intense russefeiring while at the same time it is not a holiday month. In order to examine the impact of time, we also presented the number of consultations per week by year and cohort graphically.

Results

Altogether 1 690 139 consultations for 18 – 20-year-olds were registered in the period from 2012 – 15. The total number of consultations annually increased from 417 322 in 2012 to 434 524 in 2015 (an increase of 4.1 %), while the population base grew from 197 099 to 199 689 (an increase of 1.3 %).

The total number of consultations in May for 19-year-olds was higher than in the other months and higher than for the younger and older cohorts in May in all four years of the period studied (fig. 1). In May 2015, a total of 19 891 consultations were registered for 19-year-olds, while the corresponding figure for those who were one year younger or one year older was 11 627 and 12 200 respectively (fig 1). There was little difference between the relevant cohorts in other calendar months.

Figure 1 Total number of consultations with a GP or the emergency department per calendar month for 18 – 20-year olds in… — **Figure 1** Total number of consultations with a GP or the emergency department per calendar month for 18 – 20-year olds in the period 2012 – 15

E-table 2 shows the monthly number of consultations per 1 000 inhabitants by cohort with the regular GP, the emergency department and for each diagnostic group, for 2015. The table shows a marked increase in both the number of regular GP consultations and in the number of consultations with the emergency department for 19-year-olds in May compared with 19-year-olds in other months and with cohorts who were one year younger or one year older, in the same month. The increase was most marked for the diagnostic group respiratory tract infections. For the diagnostic group accidents and injuries we also found a higher number of consultations for 19-year-olds than 18 and 20-year-olds in May, but here the total volume of consultations was considerably smaller. The years 2012 – 14 showed a similar pattern in terms of distributions and differences (data not shown).

Table 2

Number of consultations in 2015 with GPs and the accident and emergency department per month per 1000 inhabitants in age groups 18, 19 and 20 years

	18 years N = 66 869	19 years N = 66 426	20 years N = 66 394
GP, all codes
March	140	171	158
April	122	155	141
May	143	235	150
June	143	178	171
Other¹	143	152	154
Emergency department, all codes
March	22	25	26
April	23	32	29
May	31	65	33
June	24	29	28
Other¹	25	28	29
Respiratory tract infections ^{2, 3}
March	25	32	24
April	22	33	20
May	44	128	30
June	34	49	29
Other¹	29	27	24
General pain and musculoskeletalcomplaints ³
March	20	23	22
April	17	20	19
May	17	21	20
June	15	19	22
Other¹	19	20	21
Mental health problems ³
March	20	26	26
April	17	22	23
May	17	23	24
June	17	23	24
Other¹	19	23	25
Accidents and injuries ³
March	10	11	11
April	9	13	11
May	10	14	12
June	9	11	11
Other¹	11	11	11
Gastrointestinal complaints ³
March	9	12	12
April	8	10	11
May	8	10	11
June	7	9	11
Other¹	9	11	12
Other conditions ³
March	80	95	90
April	74	90	87
May	79	105	90
June	85	98	103
Other¹	83	90	93

¹ Average for other months of the year

² Including ear infections

³ See e-table 1 for details of grouping

For the entire period 2012 – 15 combined, the number of GP consultations for 19-year-olds in May compared with the number of consultations for 19-year-olds in March gave an incidence rate ratio of 1.40 (95 % CI 1.38 – 1.41) (fig. 2). Consultations with the emergency department doubled for 19-year-olds in May compared with 19-year-olds in March (IRR 2.07, 95 % CI 2.02 – 2.13). Consultations with the emergency department for 18-year-olds also showed a slightly higher incidence in May than for 19-year-olds in March, but this difference was far less than the corresponding difference between these months for 19-year-olds (fig. 2).

Figure 2 Incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95 % confidence interval (log scale) for consultations in April, May and June for… — **Figure 2** Incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95 % confidence interval (log scale) for consultations in April, May and June for 19-year-olds, and in May for 18-year-olds (data 2012 – 15). The reference group consists of 19-year-olds in March

Among the diagnostic groups, respiratory tract infections clearly stood out – with the largest increase in the number of consultations in May for 19-year-olds (IRR 3.64, 95 % CI 3.55 – 3.73 compared with 19-year-olds in March). 18-year-olds also had more consultations in May than 19-year-olds in March, but the difference was not nearly as great. The number of consultations in the diagnostic group accidents and injuries was also higher among 19-year-olds in May (IRR 1.21, 95 % CI 1.16 – 1.27), while the total number of consultations with the diagnoses general pain, mental health problems and gastrointestinal complaints was somewhat less in May than in March for 19-year-olds.

We carried out corresponding analyses for each diagnostic code within the respiratory tract infections group. All codes clearly demonstrated a pattern of increase in May for 19-year-olds, with the exception of R80 Influenza, which showed a typical seasonal pattern with a greater number of consultations in the winter months (not shown). The greatest volume of consultations was for the diagnosis R74 Acute upper respiratory infection (e-fig 3). The incidence rate ratio for this diagnosis for 19-year-olds in May compared with 19-year-olds in March was 4.41 (95 % CI 4.22 – 4.60).

Figure 3 Number of consultations with a GP or the emergency department with the diagnosis acute upper respiratory infection… — **Figure 3** Number of consultations with a GP or the emergency department with the diagnosis acute upper respiratory infection (International Classification of Primary Care 2 code R74) per calendar month for 18 – 20-year-olds in the period 2012 – 15

E-figure 4 shows the total number of consultations, the number of consultations with acute upper respiratory tract infections, and the number of consultations with an injury diagnosis for each week from March to October 2015. For 19-year-olds, there was an increase in the total number of consultations in weeks 19 and 20 (the period from 6 May to 17 May), a strong increase in the number of consultations in week 21 (18 to 24. May), followed by an ensuing decline (e‑fig 4a). Consultations for acute upper respiratory tract infections followed the same pattern (e-fig 4b). Most of the increase in injury diagnoses for 19-year-olds occurred in the weeks up to 17 May, with a sharp decline immediately after Constitution Day. However, the volume of consultations for accidents and injuries was low compared with infection diagnoses (e-fig 4c).

Figure 4 Consultations with GP or the emergency department per week in the period March–October 2015. Number of… — **Figure 4** Consultations with GP or the emergency department per week in the period March–October 2015. Number of consultations. a) All consultations. b) Consultations with the diagnosis acute upper respiratory infection. c) Consultations with injury diagnosis. The vertical line represents 17 May, which was on a Sunday this year. «Week 21» represents the period 18 – 24 May 2015 (weekdays Monday through Sunday)

Discussion

All the years from 2012 to 2015 showed a higher number of consultations with regular GPs and emergency departments in May than in all other calendar months for 19-year-olds. We observed no such pattern for other cohorts, and for other calendar months than May, there were no striking differences between 19-year-olds and the cohorts immediately below and above. The single diagnosis acute upper respiratory tract infection showed an almost fourfold increase in consultations in May for 19-year-olds compared with March. We further found that the number of consultations for 19-year-olds was high in both the first and second half of May as regards both the total number of consultations and the single diagnosis acute upper respiratory tract infection. For injuries, however, we observed only an increase in the first half of May.

The study is based on data from the Directorate of Health’s system for the control and payment of reimbursements to health service providers – KUHR. This database is not organised as a health register. Importantly, the KUHR database is almost complete, in the sense that it contains data from all consultations where Norwegian GPs have claimed reimbursement.

We know little about diagnostic quality, but assume that there is variation among diagnoses. A study from Canadian general practice has shown good data quality for the diagnoses epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease and dementia, but more moderate results for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and depression (10). An earlier Norwegian study (data from 1992 – 2008) showed that often the correct codes are not used in reporting (11). In our study, some of the uncertainty was reduced by combining diagnostic codes into large diagnostic groups. Youth Health Centres are not included in the source data, and for this reason we have been unable to capture all contact that would probably relate to sexual health and less serious mental problems.

Previous studies from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health have shown an increase in the use of antibiotics (5) and in the number of injuries treated by the specialist health service (4) in May for 19-year-olds. We assume that a large proportion of the increase in the use of antibiotics and in injuries, as well as the increase we now observe in the general practitioner services, can be associated with the russ period. The number of consultations for the russ cohort increased in the first half of May prior to the start of the examination period.

For most of those participating in these celebrations, May is nevertheless also examination time. Exam grades are important for further qualification for higher education and work, and illness during an examination that can be documented by a medical certificate gives an entitlement to take a new examination later (12). The strong increase in GP consultations also in the second half of May can probably be explained to some extent by a need for treatment for infections during examination time or to document an illness in order to secure examination rights. However, the data do not enable us to analyse the prevalence of medical certificates linked to exemption from exams.

The relative increase in consultations in May among 19-year-olds was greatest in relation to consultations with emergency departments, but the numerical increase was greatest for consultations with GPs. This concurs with the findings of a study on the influenza pandemic in 2009, in which the authors concluded that the general practitioner services were flexible, and could respond to increased need in the population (13).

Russ celebrations ahead of an important examination period are, to the best of our knowledge, a unique Norwegian tradition. Similar celebrations among adolescents and young adults in other countries are more often linked to the start of studies or take place during holiday periods (14, 15). Buddy scheme arrangements at Norwegian higher education institutions take place at the commencement of studies and are considered small-scale in comparison with russ celebrations (16, 17).

Suggestions have been put forward several times to move these celebrations to the post-examination period, or alternatively to move the examinations forward to take place before these celebrations. Last year a new committee was appointed to examine the reorganisation of the school year (18).

Conclusion

The cohort completing upper secondary education had a much greater number of consultations with the general practitioner services in May compared with the cohort below and above in all years covered by the study. The most frequent reason was respiratory tract infections. The increase began in the period before 17 May and persisted into the examination period.

We can probably explain the increased need for medical assistance during the russ period by a combination of a higher incidence of respiratory tract infections and a greater need for treatment and doctor’s certificates during the examination period.

Main findings

MAIN MESSAGE

In May 2015, 19-year-olds had a total of 19 891 consultations in the general practitioner services, while the corresponding figure for 18-year-olds was 11 627, and for 20-year-olds 12 200.

Respiratory infections accounted for most of the increase, although injuries and accidents also played a part.

All years in the period between 2012 and 2015 showed an identical pattern.

Literature

1.
Statistisk sentralbyrå. Nøkkeltall for utdanning. www.ssb.no/utdanning/nokkeltall/utdanning (3.4.2017).
2.
Fjær EG, Pedersen W, Sandberg S. Party on wheels: mobile party spaces in the Norwegian high school graduation celebration. Br J Sociol 2016; 67: 328 – 47. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
3.
Utdanningsdirektoratet. Kalender. https://www.udir.no/Kalender/Eksamen-og-prover/ (3.4.2017).
4.
Austdal LE, Strand MC, Vindenes V et al. Forekomst av skader i russetiden. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 2015; 135: 648 – 52. [PubMed]
5.
Blix HS, Hjellvik V. Økt bruk av antibiotika blant 19-åringer i May. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 2012; 132: 1084 – 8. [PubMed]
6.
Folkehelseinsituttet. Ungdom bør vurdere å vaksinere seg mot smittsom hjernehinnebetennelse. https://www.fhi.no/sv/smittsomme-sykdommer/hjernehinnebetennelse/ungdom-bor-vurdere-a-vaksinere-seg-mot-smittsom-hjernehinnebetennelse/ (3.4.2017).
7.
Statistisk sentralbyrå. Tabell 07459: Folkemengde, etter kjønn og ettårig alder. https://www.ssb.no/statistikkbanken/ (3.4.2017).
8.
Den norske legeforening. Normaltariffen. http://normaltariffen.legeforeningen.no/ (3.4.2017).
9.
Statistisk sentralbyrå. Allmennlegetjenesten, 2012. https://www.ssb.no/helse/statistikker/fastlegetj/aar/2013-09-18 (3.4.2017).
10.
Williamson T, Green ME, Birtwhistle R et al. Validating the 8 CPCSSN case definitions for chronic disease surveillance in a primary care database of electronic health records. Ann Fam Med 2014; 12: 367 – 72. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
11.
Botsis T, Bassøe C-F, Hartvigsen G. Sixteen years of ICPC use in Norwegian primary care: looking through the facts. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2010; 10: 11. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
12.
Lovdata. Forskrift til opplæringslova. Kap. 4 – 5 § 3 – 35. https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2006 – 06 – 23 – 724 (14.2.2017).
13.
Simonsen KA, Hunskaar S, Sandvik H et al. Capacity and adaptations of general practice during an influenza pandemic. PLoS One 2013; 8: e69408. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
14.
Campo S, Poulos G, Sipple JW. Prevalence and profiling: hazing among college students and points of intervention. Am J Health Behav 2005; 29: 137 – 49. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
15.
Riordan BC, Scarf D, Conner TS. Is orientation week a gateway to persistent alcohol use in university students? A preliminary investigation. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2015; 76: 204 – 11. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
16.
Rimstad SLS, Selbekk AS, Robertson IE. Fadderuken og alkohol – unntakstilstand eller etablering av nye alkoholvaner? Rapport 2/2011. Stavanger: Kompetansesenter rus – region vest Stavanger, Rogaland A-senter, 2011.
17.
Stålesen E. Hvordan opplever studenter ved Universitetet i Agder forholdet til alkohol i fadderuken? Om fester, relasjoner og overskridelser. Masteravhandling. Kristiansand: Institutt for psykososial helse, Universitetet i Agder, 2015.
18.
Mellingsæter H. Skoleåret kan bli endret – nytt utvalg skal se på omorganisering. Aftenposten. 17.6.2016. www.aftenposten.no/norge/Skolearet-kan-bli-endret---nytt-utvalg-skal-se-pa-omorganisering-478751b.html (14.2.2017).

Published: 4 May 2017

Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 4 May 2017

doi:

10.4045/tidsskr.17.0158

Received 14 February 2017, first revision submitted 6 April 2017, accepted 18 April 2017. Editor: Inge Rasmus Groote.

Published: 4 May 2017

Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 2017

doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0158

Received 14 February 2017, first revision submitted 6 April 2017, accepted 18 April 2017. Editor: Inge Rasmus Groote.

PDF

Print

Upper secondary school leaving celebrations and final exams – consultations in general practice and emergency care

BACKGROUND

MATERIAL AND METHOD

RESULTS

INTERPRETATION

Material and Method

Table 1

Statistical analyses

Results

Table 2

Discussion

Conclusion

MAIN MESSAGE

Recent Articles